Live Session: Save 1000s of Hours with ShareFile E-Signatures Register Now
E-signature compliance gets more complicated when digital approvals need to cross country borders. Here are some points to consider and some best practices to implement.
Remote work and digital workflows are now normal across every industry, with e-signatures residing at the heart of modern business processes. But when contracts and approvals cross borders, e-signature compliance can become a lot more complicated than it already was. This article examines some critical considerations for addressing e-signature requirements in a global marketplace.
In this age of remote work and digital-first operations, more documents are being digitally signed than ever before, and for good reason. E-signing is convenient, frictionless and, quite frankly, your customers expect it. It can reduce paperwork, accelerate deal cycles and make it easier for organizations to collaborate with clients and vendors anywhere in the world.
The problem, of course, is that while cross-border deals are common, e-signature laws have not been standardized worldwide. In fact, e-signature laws can vary widely from one country to the next.
Of course, this inconsistency does not mean that organizations can simply ignore e-signature laws when dealing with customers abroad. At best, failing to follow international e-signature laws can lead to contracts becoming unenforceable. At worst, an organization could find itself in regulatory trouble which may lead to regulatory penalties or violations.
As a result, e-signature compliance must be treated as a core operational and legal priority, rather than an afterthought.
Many organizations are therefore adopting secure document collaboration platforms like Progress ShareFile, which combines encrypted file sharing, workflow automation, and integrated e-signature capabilities. By managing document exchange, approvals and signatures within a single controlled environment, businesses can help reduce regulatory and operational risk while maintaining auditability across international transactions.
Even though e-signature laws vary from country to country, there are a few core principles that tend to hold true across most jurisdictions. As with paper documents, for example, there is usually a stipulation in which all parties involved must clearly express an intent to sign. There may even be a requirement for parties to explicitly consent to the use of electronic signatures.
Another common requirement is that the electronic signature must be securely linked to the document being signed. This helps prevent someone from simply copying and pasting a signature to a document that the supposed signer never actually approved.
Additionally, many countries that allow digital signatures have regulations in place that require electronically signed documents to be tamper-evident and verifiable. This typically involves maintaining detailed audit logs that record:
Modern document workflow platforms like ShareFile support organizations in addressing these requirements by automatically generating timestamped audit trails and activity logs that verify how a document moved through the signing process.
These core principles underscore an extremely important point. Electronic signatures and digital signatures (which are often referred to as e-signatures) are not the same thing. An electronic signature is a broad category consisting of things like click-to-sign, type your name or a scanned image of an actual signature.
Digital signatures are different. A digital signature is cryptographically secured and tied to an audit log. Unlike many types of electronic signatures, digital signatures are designed to be verifiable. Most global e-signature regulations center around this verifiability.
The challenge for organizations is figuring out which laws apply to e-signatures in a given situation. As a general rule, e-signature requirements are based on two things: geographic location and use case.
For example, in the United States, electronic signatures are governed by the [E-Sign Act](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=(title:15 section:7031 edition:prelim). While this act establishes a framework describing how electronic signatures may be recognized and how they may be used, there may be additional requirements that go well beyond those that are outlined in the E-sign Act, especially when it relates to use cases.
That’s just for the United States. Each governing body sets forth its own requirements. The European Union, for example, has Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 (eIDAS). The United Kingdom also largely follows these rules, but the requirements have started to diverge since Brexit. Canada has e-signature governance such as the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA). These are just a few, extremely simplified, examples of the ways in which e-signatures are addressed by regulation around the world.
Learn how built-in eIDAS-aligned capabilities for e-signatures can simplify global business.
One of the more easily overlooked aspects to using e-signatures across borders is the data-residency requirements. While many countries have regulations requiring immutable audit logs, those requirements may differ with regard to where the logs and the signed documents themselves must be stored.
Occasionally, you may run into a situation in which the data residency requirements for the countries involved are contradictory to one another. As an example, suppose that you are in a country that requires documents and audit logs to be stored domestically, but are dealing with someone in the European Union. As a general rule, the GDPR regulations restricts the transfer of European Economic Area (EEA) personal data outside of the European Union unless an approved transfer mechanism is in place.
In situations like these, you would need to look for a regulatory exception. In the case of the European Union, for example, you may be able to rely on an adequacy decision or another mechanism such as a Standard Contractual Clause (SCC).
These complexities make strong data governance capabilities essential. Organizations must verify that document workflows include secure storage, encryption, access controls, and visibility into document activity across the lifecycle of an agreement.
E‑signature compliance can be challenging, as applicable laws vary widely based on both jurisdiction and use case. For this reason, it is critically important to regularly review compliance requirements with legal counsel and to provide training for relevant teams on the specific regulatory obligations associated with the regions in which they operate.
In addition, organizations should select an e‑signature solution that is designed with compliance in mind. Using a platform that supports applicable legal, security and audit requirements can help reduce regulatory and operational risk and make it easier to navigate an evolving regulatory landscape.
Organizations can reduce risk by following several key best practices.
Understand regional regulations
Work closely with legal teams to understand the specific compliance requirements in each region where your organization operates.
Align signature methods to transaction risk
Certain agreements may require stronger identity verification or digital signature methods.
Maintain detailed audit logs
Robust activity tracking can help demonstrate compliance and protect organizations.
Train internal teams
Employees involved in sales, legal or operations should understand how regional regulations affect digital agreements.
Use a compliance-focused document platform
Platforms such as ShareFile, which combine secure document exchange, workflow automation and integrated e-signature capabilities, can help organizations manage cross-border agreements while supporting security controls, regulatory alignment efforts and operational efficiency.
Learn more about ShareFile integrated e-signature capabilities.
Brien Posey is an internationally best-selling technology author and speaker, and a former 22-time Microsoft MVP. Prior to going freelance, Posey served as lead network engineer for the United States Department of Defense at Fort Knox and as a CIO for a chain of hospitals and healthcare facilities. In addition to his continuing IT work, Posey has spent the last 10 years actively training to be a commercial astronaut.